Autism assessment

Make the developmental pattern reviewable without flattening the person into a score

Autism assessment depends on pattern across development and context. SheldonDx helps clinicians collect and compare that evidence while keeping source, uncertainty, masking or adaptation, sensory context and co-occurring needs visible.

A question for your current workflow

Can you trace the conclusion back through early history, present-day impact and the people or records that supplied each part?

Developmental history is a thread, not a form field

Review early communication, play, routines, interests, sensory experience, education and relationships across periods. Missing or uncertain history stays marked as such instead of being silently completed.

Informant disagreement is clinical information

Patient and informant accounts do not need to match to be useful. SheldonDx keeps them separate so the clinician can examine setting, observation window, masking, relationship and reliability.

The report remains an accountable clinical artifact

Structured drafting can reduce assembly work, but the clinician reviews language, evidence links, limitations, differential reasoning and recommendations before sign-off.

Questions worth answering before a demo

Does SheldonDx require one specific autism instrument?

No single instrument makes the diagnosis. The workflow is designed to preserve multiple evidence sources and clinician judgement; instrument availability and licensing remain service responsibilities.

Can it handle an unavailable childhood informant?

The workflow can record the limitation and alternative documentary or witness evidence. The clinician decides how that affects the assessment.

Inspect an autism evidence example

See how developmental, current-life and informant evidence remain separate through review.

Book an autism workflow walkthrough