Keep the source attached to the claim
Patient, informant, document, observation and clinician inputs remain distinguishable through the review workflow. A polished paragraph should never make the origin of evidence disappear.
Clinician-controlled evidence
The whole assessment workflow
SheldonDx is designed for clinicians assessing autism and ADHD who need evidence to remain attributable, disagreements to remain visible and every clinical conclusion to remain theirs. It connects assessment work that is usually fragmented across forms, inboxes, notes and report documents.
Where does evidence become difficult to trust: collection, comparison, synthesis, sign-off or the handover after diagnosis?
Patient, informant, document, observation and clinician inputs remain distinguishable through the review workflow. A polished paragraph should never make the origin of evidence disappear.
The platform can organise, retrieve and scaffold review. It does not replace the clinician’s independent judgement, differential reasoning, responsibility for risk or final sign-off.
Assessment does not end when the report is exported. Clinicians can select curated resources and share them by WhatsApp or copied link, giving the next conversation a concrete starting point.
No. SheldonDx supports clinician-supervised evidence review and workflow. The qualified clinician independently assesses the evidence and owns every clinical decision.
The current workflow is focused on autism and ADHD assessment, with cross-condition differential context where appropriate.
Review a representative workflow and decide whether the structure matches how your service actually assesses.
Book a workflow walkthrough