The whole assessment workflow

One evidence path—from referral question to a resource the client can actually use

SheldonDx is designed for clinicians assessing autism and ADHD who need evidence to remain attributable, disagreements to remain visible and every clinical conclusion to remain theirs. It connects assessment work that is usually fragmented across forms, inboxes, notes and report documents.

A question for your current workflow

Where does evidence become difficult to trust: collection, comparison, synthesis, sign-off or the handover after diagnosis?

Keep the source attached to the claim

Patient, informant, document, observation and clinician inputs remain distinguishable through the review workflow. A polished paragraph should never make the origin of evidence disappear.

Use automation for structure, not authority

The platform can organise, retrieve and scaffold review. It does not replace the clinician’s independent judgement, differential reasoning, responsibility for risk or final sign-off.

Close the loop after feedback

Assessment does not end when the report is exported. Clinicians can select curated resources and share them by WhatsApp or copied link, giving the next conversation a concrete starting point.

Questions worth answering before a demo

Does SheldonDx diagnose patients?

No. SheldonDx supports clinician-supervised evidence review and workflow. The qualified clinician independently assesses the evidence and owns every clinical decision.

Is the platform only for autism?

The current workflow is focused on autism and ADHD assessment, with cross-condition differential context where appropriate.

See the evidence path before discussing a contract

Review a representative workflow and decide whether the structure matches how your service actually assesses.

Book a workflow walkthrough